Quote:
Originally Posted by danielpalos
Why would the People's Committee of the Inside Group, be more interested electing candidates that have no socioeconomic solutions to our current problems; and, instead must rely on an inefficient "socialized" warfare-state economic model that runs massive deficits?
Wouldn't a welfare-state economy that runs massive surpluses be more conducive to any private profit motive by the private sector?
|
Because the candidate who can run this country in better way must have at least some of common sense, a feeling of honor, respect of law and the Constitution and a little bit of morality. In such condition, he would not waste money and lives for an unnecessary war. Let alone to start false flag attack to rip the civil rights from people. (Patriot Act)
That's why they put an incompetent puppet on the seat. Bush willingly sold his soul to that group. He did everything other people dare not do to favour that Group. He made a mess on US economy and politics.
The foundation for Bush's rule is "war" and "terror attack". We saw how Bush got his power by activating 911 attack, (justify the war in Mid-east) anthrax attack (push the pass through of Patriot Act) DC sniper shooting spree (push the pass through of Iraq war authorization). To maintain his rule, he intimidate people with continue Terror threat. (by its tool - Al Qaida)
Remember, the cost of all these were paid by American people with their tax money and their lives. The benefiter is a little interest group. Israel got its state security; Pentagon (DOD) got fat budget; Feds (DOJ) had expanded police power; oil group and military industry got big business.
Sorry, I try to explain all these with simple words without your ""socialized" warfare-state economic" or "socioeconomic solutions".