Quote:
Quote:
|
"Pay us this amount, or we will variously take away your freedom, your vehicle, your house, and/or appreciably more money than we're currently demanding." Does this sound like something consentual?
|
What it sounds like is an honest presentation of your choices.
|
So then you'd be fine with somebody stopping by your place and saying "Take off your clothes and lie on the bed, or I will variously destroy your property, burn down your house, and/or do worse things to you than I had originally planned," assuming it was an honest presentation of your choices?
Quote:
|
...By your definition every restriction of freedom is theft. In fact by your definition society itself is theft of freedom. And that broad a definition of theft robs the term of meaning.
|
No, theft is something taken
without consent. The society we live in dictates that I'm not allowed to kill you for disagreeing with me. Taking away that freedom is not theft, as I both didn't want it in the first place and also gladly trade it for a similar protection from you if it were needed. I similarly consent to give up my freedom to steal others' property, violate their persons, and abdicate contractual agreements, as do most people in our society.
If all laws were stricken tomorrow, and/or liberty1776 succeeded in eliminating the state, would most people suddenly become homocidal, or otherwise violate the basic rights I listed above? No, because such restrictions are
consentual. Would most people continue to pay their tax bills in full? I expect very few (if any) would, including me. Why not? Because taxes are taken without true consent.