Quote:
Originally Posted by Luap
Tell that to China. It is on a very fine line between "closer to a socialist" and "closer to a capitalist" economy--and how does one even define that line? Anyway, it doesn't make sense to assert that you can't really achieve a market economy if you start from a position of government control: you are telling a large portion of the world that all of their reforms are doomed simply because of the position they started in. I don't really understand your assertion here, either. Are you saying that any public regulation at all makes the economy closer to a command system than a free trade system?
What policies would you suggest to a state with an economy changing from command to market?
|
Actually, I
am saying they are all doomed. Not right away, but they will all fail in time. Nothing lasts forever. All governments have a finite lifetime.
Let me put it this way. If you start with a government that decides how things are supposed to work, there is a limit to just how free an economy can be. That limit will vary within a range, but there is definitely a limit to just how much control a government is willing to cede back to the people. In order to achieve a market economy, you need to start from the principle of freedom. That principle is not compatible with government mandates.