View Single Post
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 15,127

United_States     Russian

Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by timj219 View Post
It is because the huge cost of getting elected precludes the candidacy of any but the corrupt.
Are you reading what I'm writing? I already told you: this is because voters keep voting for the guy with the best suits and the most advertisements!

I don't believe there is a law on the books that says you have to have a few million dollars to get elected.
Quote:

When all the candidates with the wherewithal to mount an effective campaign are bought and paid for, voters are left with little to choose between them.
Voters can vote for ANYONE! I believe the requirements are a certain age and natural-born citizenship. Nowhere does it say you have to have good advertising campaigns and lots of money! That is a symptom of a retarded voting population! It's in the hands of the voters.
Quote:
Over time voters come to believe they cannot affect the process and lose interest which exacerbates the problem.
Actually, that IS the problem: voters who think there are only two possible candidates and that voting for someone who isn't one of the two retards is "throwing your vote away."
Quote:
Maybe they won't stop it ever since even the most pie in the sky scenario still leaves government with vast quantities of money.
And you get rid of the rest, or most of the rest, by electing semi-honest officials.
__________________
Little known fact #46: Every definition of a given word in a dictionary is used equally as often.

Little known fact #53: Your testicles serve only one purpose: to reproduce. Every other function is a complete accident.

Little known fact #65: Because the human body does not prepare for death, humans never die.
Reply With Quote