Quote:
Originally Posted by Analyst
Indeed, we must understand that the reason why the whole war program was organized - accoring to the PNAC - dominance in the region and destruction of Iran. Somehow Bush wasted his 911 as he was not brave enough to attack Iran first even if it was the original purpose. He decided to take the step-by-step destruction of the countries and now his time has run out with Iran. And now it is extremely difficult to motivate Americans to pay the next war ... and also to conduct a new 911-type of false flag operation as the whole world is waiting for it ... and also some plans have been leaked out and had to be rejected (sinking MSS Enterprise, B52-nukes, etc).
|
With almost three times the population of Iraq, Iran would have been a far more difficult, if not impossible target for US occupation. The failure in Iraq due to US inability to provide adequate occupation troops to totally subdue the Iraq population (400,000) was forecast by senior US military officers who were then retired and/or ignored. The lie of Iraqis welcoming US occupation soon became apparent to the US public as did the waste of US resources in a futile war that US leadership erroneously stated would be paid for by Iraqi oil.
Quote:
|
Hitler had the same strategy, but he was much better organized as Bush. Some documents say that many German Nazies are/were working in CIA. This will explain why the documents and strategies of the Bush Administration (actually neocon Hawks) are completely similar. Hitlers PNAC and Bush's PNAC are 1:1. Also the speeches of Bush have many similarities with Goebbels and Hitler - so they have studied well the Nazi methodology. And WW3 will be the ultimate goal of the neo-nazies as well.
|
PNAC's Blitzkrieg lost momentum due to current US administration's misuse of a military unsuitable for any large-scale engagement outside of conventional warfare. And by that action lost public support. Administration's faulty overriding of military recommendations (not enough troops) became factual from the early days of Iraq armed resistance to US occupation and US implementation of a puppet Iraq government.
Hitler didn't lose momentum or begin overriding military recommendations until
Göring's loss at the Battle of Britain and the beginning of Barbarossa. The major similarities between current administration policy/PNAC and those of Hitler are military misuse and attempted resource gain by force resulting in economics dependent on military expansion by government capital injections; printing more money than the economic system can absorb.
Propaganda is propaganda and always initially successful in stimulating the patriotism gene of those in the masses unfortunate enough to have same who unerringly follow self-serving leadership. Any copy writer in any era can produce the same result by simply following Göring's opinion of war and extreme nationalism:
~Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. ...Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.~
PNAC and current administration lost their momentum way too early in their domination goal and will go down in history as examples of political failure. Whether or not the US will be economically damaged by present military aggressiveness to the extent of the former USSR is still under determination as evidenced by continuation of disastrous foreign policy and ongoing USD problems.