Quote:
|
This was discussed here when U.S. invaded Iraq.
|
Well I would say at this point it merits further discussion considering how events have unfolded since the invasion.
Quote:
|
Also Iraqi themselves might have a thing or two to say about slashing their nation.
|
If the Kurds are also considered Iraqi, they seem to want out of that situation. The one thing the Shia-Sunni communities can agree on is that they neither dont like the Kurds. Why continually subject the Kurds to thier ineptness. The Kurds are poised to prosper if legitimatly allowed to.
Quote:
|
Also it was concluded back then that should Kurds gain more independence, they would start assaulting Iran and Turkey in order to gain land from them, which in turn would bring new Iraq and U.S. against Iran and Turkey.
|
The Kurds would need to understand up front that agression would not be tolerated. They would be allowed defence forces only. Under my idea, large amounts of American military currently deployed to Iraq would move into Kurdistan. The reason is two-fold. To provide deterrent from foreign powers from invading. Plus, to ensure the Kurds to not become aggressive.
I honestly believe. If you said, to Kurdish leaders. Look, you can have independence. You have all of the resource wealth and basic infastructure already in place where agressive acts become counter-productive to thier purposes. If you invade another country, or support terrorism(because once they gain independence, thier rebellion groups become obsolete) you will be overrun by foreign armies and most likely forever be an repressed population without self determination.