My opinion is that Ron Paul is good on the issue of illegal immigration, ok on economic issues and not so good on moral values. I do see him as one who personally believes in moral values but not as one who will fight for them. I agree to a point on alot of his economic stances but I think that he is too libertarian for my tastes (I believe that there should be some government regulation on the economy, although I do believe that ii should be limited). I love his stance on wanting to get rid of the problem of anchor babies, even though I know that in order to get rid of anchor babies we would have to amend the Constitution (14th amendment to be specific).

All in all, I do definitely respect the man (although I have a hard time respecting some of his zealots on occasion) and I do want him to be in office because I feel that he is doing a good job (one of the few I actually feel that about). He is at least consistent on his stances and will work for what he promises (although the problem comes in when I disagree with what he promises). I was looking into him as a potential candidate for my vote for president but after seeing some of his stances I've decided that he isn't the man for the job IMO.

__________________
Serious Quotes:


Funny But True Quotes
Those who argue for complete secularism are funny. They see what government does and then argue that we don't need it to start with prayer.