I know, I know, I probably shouldn't butt in and probably should ignore you, still I'm confused on how exactly that makes him a white supremacist? Being rational makes you a white supremacist? To me, race is a silly notion invented by humans to make life more complex and hard than it needs to be (one of many). That being said there is most certainly a line in the sand, but its one we've drawn ourselves. As for black people committing more crime, I don't know about that. I do know that there are more black people in jail than white people comparably.

That being said, it seems to me the only people that really have to worry about black people though are black people the way they keep killing each other. Still, the stigma stands and when you get robbed or whatever the first question most people ask is "was he black" (Which is exactly what my father asked when I was robbed in front of our house. I mean of course he was black, it was dark! *ba-da-dum*). Not that race has a lot to do with you being robbed, though gangster rap certainly hasn't helped in glorifying stupidity, but the reality is that those lacking education and means are also unlikely in having sound parenting or supervision and thus more likely to fall into a life of crime. Again though, scientifically the only real race being the human race please don't bother believing that there really is that much of a difference between us all.

That being said this is addressed to Brett Golden, your question is flawed. It should be which race commits the most racist crimes? The violent part is murky, and it suggest that all crimes violent or otherwise between different races are based in racial motivation. This is suggested by the article as well, and which is why indeed the author would be deemed a racist. The issues is much more complex than statistics. They only tell part of the story, and to reach a conclusion on that little piece of the puzzle is fallacy.