Quote:
Originally Posted by picaro
I 'concede' some Jews did play a minor role, as middle men. I also 'concede' that Italians Spaniards, Dutch, English, and every other European 'race' played a bigger role. I also 'concede' many African tribes played the biggest role in the slave trade. Catholics, Protestants, Greek Orthodox, Muslim, all religions are represented, and in far greater numbers than Jews.
Sure thing ... right after I Google Reptilean Shapeshifters ...
There's no doubt they are the vast majority of investors, and provided the overwhelming investment of funds.
Well, that's because Jews in Europe pretty much worked for the thrones of Europe; they had little say in the matter ...
This is wrong, of course; African tribes were their partners and provided the 'merchandise' and political protections for the marketplaces.
And obviously, those like you, vehemently DEMAND to take all the blame and the consequences that goes with it.
|
[/quote]
A jew, ain cha ?? Which is why it's in your self interests to defend your tribesmen against documented proofs compiled by black historians as reported in Farrakhan's book "Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews".
In your above post you in effect, placed most of the blame for slavery of blacks on blacks, themselves. Then you say others who partipated in the trade were larger in number than jews, as if numbers were more important than money and leadership in carrying on the trade in black Africans.
Personally, I'll believe the word of Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam over the word of any jew or any gang of jews, every time.
Your argument is with the jewish records themselves, wherein big jews confessed they played a dominate role in slavery - jewish records from the 16th thru 19th centuries that black historians obtained and sourced in their book for the whole world to see. And jewish document sources no jew alive will go before the American media and debate with Farrakhan on their authenticities. Even though he's dared the jews to, many times.