Quote:
|
Okay, but can you show how much closer? Did you take into account the fact that the shot changed, as well? Have you found the exact dimensions of the space suit from front to back, the distance between the camera and the flag and exactly where the astronaut was located at the time of the video? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Your presenting a video to us that shows an astronaut walk right in front of a flag, obscuring any potential contact, then saying he didn't make contact (with no proof), then saying that because of this non-proof, the rest of it didn't happen. I hope you can understand my skepticism of your claims.
|
The fact that he's way too far from the flag to be able to touch it is enough. If it's that obvious, there's no need to do exact measurements.
I hope this doesn't offend you but I want to see how objective you are.
Take a look at this thread from the Clavius forum.
ApolloHoax.net - The Dust-Free Sand Issue
Jay Windley and those regular posters there have a foregone conclusion and they distort science to fit their foregone conclusion. They made a big blunder when they took that stand which is explained in that thread.
I'd like to hear your opinion of the issue raised there.
This is who Jay Windley is in case anybody doesn't know.
Clavius: Conspiracy - about the author
This is the Clavius site.
Clavius Moon Base - debunking the moon hoax
This is the Clavius forum.
ApolloHoax.net - Home
This thread shows how objective Jay Windley is. I'd like to hear your opinion of this too.
ApolloHoax.net - A question for Jay Windley
His post is the fourth one from the top.