View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-27-2007
Brett Golden Brett Golden is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Permanently Banned

 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 1,022

   
Should Holocaust Denial Be A Criminal Offense

Presently, efforts are underway to criminalize denial of the "holocaust" in 27 European nations (European Union - EU). Holocaust denial and even trivializing the holocaust is already illegal in 10 European countries and Canada. Last year alone 15,000 Germans were prosecuted, and many thousands have been imprisoned, the most noteable being Ernst Zundel (see: www.zundelsite.org), who's been in prison for almost 5 years now.

For complete details, google: Holocaust denial laws Europe

The discussion here should focus on whether or not denial and/or trivializing the "holocaust" of the jews should be criminal offenses, or should the right of free speech be defended. Let's not get into the question of whether or not 6 million jews were deliberately murdered by the Germans during WWII. Only if it should be legal to question and/or deny it actually happened:

Here's one commentary on the subject:



'Holocaust Denial' Laws are Disgraceful
By Mark Weber - November 27, 2005

David Irving, the controversial British historian, was arrested in Austria on November 11 for a 16-year-old violation of that country’s “Holocaust denial” statute. He has now been formally charged, and if found guilty could face years in prison.

His case is by no means unique. In Germany, France, Austria, Belgium, Switzerland and several other European countries, as well as in Israel, it is a crime publicly to dispute the official version of Holocaust history.

The list of those who have been fined, imprisoned, or forced into exile for “denying the Holocaust” includes Robert Faurisson and Roger Garaudy in France, Siegfried Verbeke in Belgium, Juergen Graf and Gaston-Armand Amaudruz in Switzerland, and Guenter Deckert, Hans Schmidt and Fredrick Toben in Germany.

On November 8 the trial in Germany of “Holocaust denier” Ernst Zundel began with a dramatic clash between his attorneys and the presiding judge. And a few days later Germar Rudolf, a German citizen, was deported from Chicago to his homeland, where he likewise faces years of imprisonment for “denying the Holocaust.”

Tony Blair’s government considered introducing a “Holocaust denial” statute in Britain, but eventually rejected the idea. Italy, Ireland, Norway, Denmark and Sweden are among the other European countries that have declined to enact such laws.

Some people may be offended by those who play down Jewish death and suffering during World War II. But free and open societies protect even offensive speech. That’s why western countries defend the right of their citizens, for example, to praise Communism or promote atheism.

“Holocaust denial” laws violate ancient and universal standards of justice. They criminalize even factual or truthful statements that “play down” or “whitewash” the Holocaust. They are selective and one-sided. In countries where they are on the books, the Holocaust is the only chapter of history that cannot be freely discussed. They inhibit historical inquiry and restrict free speech. They are a disgrace, and should be repealed.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote