Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorHammer
Are we talking Crimes and Mercies or Other Loses?
A valid point. Most people here wouldn't even know where places like Schlesien, Sudetenland, Ostpuressen, etc.... even were. Still, when dealing with historical subjects, it is always a good practice to be as specific as possible.
'Begged' isn't the word I would use. 'Demanded' (some of his demands were very reasonable, IMO), even 'bullied', would be a more apt word.
To avoid the risk of getting into an even larger debate about what triggered WW1 and WW2 (they have both been discussed at length elsewhere), I'll let this slide.
I misread what you originally posted. I thought you were trying to claim that all German women (in the entire Reich) were raped. My mistake.
|
The book was definitely "Crimes and Mercies" ThorHammer. But you aren't the only one who's questioned my posting of that figure of 13.7 million. I've got the book around here somewhere, and will look it up when time permits. I don't think we can prove the point either way on the net. I'm certain I did read that figure in the book. But I understand that it's hard to believe.
German women and girls were raped all over Germany by the various Allies, though mostly by jew-led USSR troops, who in fact, were ordered by their commanders to "take their women as your booty and break their wills", as a result of an official military order by a high ranking jewish officer (forgot his name - Urlicstein? Something like that)
The American and British troops didn't have to rape as profusely, since the German women were starving and willing to sell their bodies for a can of C-rations and other foods, in order to feed their children and themselves to stay alive. Why rape when millions of women and girls are starving, thus voluntary victims ?
The Americans and British deliberately prevented sufficient food supplies from reaching the German population, and for long after the war ended.