Quote:
Originally Posted by Steerpike
My argument was based on objective facts or reality. If there is any conflict in claims, then they both can't be factually correct.
If one defines correct as an unverified notion or belief, then correct fails to have its accepted meaning.
If one believes that there is no god and there is a god, then one is incorrect. If one believes that there is a god and there is no god, then one is incorrect.
Subjective appeals won't change this.
|
Well, it gets a little spicy since all of those concepts we conform to or agree with in order to be correct are kind of hanging in subjective limbo when it comes to claims for which there can be no evidence.
Subjective appeal is all you have in order to resolve the correctness of those claims.