Quote:
Originally Posted by Steerpike
Conclusion is logical fallacy. There may be other reasons why these people were hit by lightning, such as having metal on their persons at the time.
|
No, the conclusion is inductive, not fallacious. My intention is to make this as wide as possible - for which induction is a perfect instrument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steerpike
Again fallacious conclusion. One could conclude that mice might have made those chewing marks. They may have been put there by something else.
|
Again, the conclusion is based on induction and is not fallacious.
This applies to the rest of your comments as well.