I have to go to work after this, so I will make this my last response.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank
The American refusal to enforce their laws caused this mess...
|
You obviously weren't listening.
Quote:
|
Millions of illegals pouring over the border without permission to take a piece of the American financial pie is not an invasion?
|
No, seeing as though the majority
do stay and become a part of that pie.
Quote:
|
Could you explain 'reconquista' to the forum?
|
Gladly. First a term for the Spanish's reconquest of Moorish Iberia, the term resurfaced in the 1970's when Chicano Nationalists wanted the lands of the Southwest back for Mexico. (Considering the way it was taken, they sort of have a point) Currently used by the Mexica movement (A small organization based in Los Angeles with a small membership and no affiliation to any other group) as a term describing the assimilation of all the countries of North and Central America into one super-country named Anahuac. Overall, about as ridiculous as saying that the US should put 100,000 troops on the US/Mexico border, but with a little historical backing, as the land does historically belong to indigenous peoples, but we won't get into that argument. Pointing out the lunacy of a radical group does not say anything about the ethnicity that the members of that group belong to or purport to represent, just as you wouldn't want statements from the KKK being applied to all white people.
[quote]
So you still decline to answer my question but opt to ask more questions; well maybe the following article will explain some things. Yes, it is from Jared Taylor but he quotes third party sources including government statistics.
VDARE.com: 01/10/07 - Do We Need More Hispanics?
Quote:
I skimmed it, and it seems like just another essay full of ethnocentric hate. Assimilation does not happen instantly, it happens over generations. Most of the things that that article blames on Hispanics are problems of socio-economic status, not race. And the reason that I asked you that question was to try and get to the heart of the issue. I know why you think that Mexicans will be unable to succeed where the Irish did, I just didn't know if you did, and it appears you don't. Care to explain ethnocentrism to the forum? Because unless Hispanic people are somehow genetically inferior to white people, there is no reason that they shouldn't be able to assimilate. The only explanation for your position is that you truly believe that for some reason, white people are genetically superior to other races. I'm also sure that the reason you think that is because you're a part of the white race. But just remember that 94% of people believe that they are above average.
Quote:
|
So whitey is to blame for the failure of Mexico?
|
Whitey is to blame for propping up a dictatorship that has oppressed people for years. Whitey is to blame for taking a part in that oppression itself.
|
Quote:
|
Assuming your claims were correct; an apology is a far cry from permitting an invasion. Second, your opinion of immigration law is based on what? Immigration laws are suppose to be geared toward benefiting the nation enacting them not potential wannabe immigrants.
|
Me and the Hispanics were just talking about how paranoid you are. I stated earlier that cheap labor is necessary in a capitalist system, especially in one where major corporations like Wal-Mart force companies to slash prices and pay their workers below living wages. Who is going to work those jobs other than immigrants? White people? Because I don't see white people rushing out to the tomato fields to pick.
Anyway, I don't want there to be anger between us. Your opinion is your opinion and it is just as valid as my own. That being said, thank you for the discourse and I hope you have a wonderful day. Peace, love and cookies.