Quote:
|
I don't like the majority of republican and democratic candidates, and have previously expressed that they are both big government.
|
If you Libertarians don't recognize that Democrats are almost entirely responsible for the massive social spending, then Libertarians in office will accomplish nothing.
Quote:
|
If you're trying to drive the point further that American voters are, for the most part, retarded, then you can stop. You've succeeded, and I didn't disagree with you to begin with. You're not rubbing any salt, at least not into my skin.
|
You mean like voting for a Libertarian because he voted against NAFTA? Actually I wouldn't call someone retarded for falling for it, since it is quite the slight of hand the free-traitors have pulled off.
Quote:
|
I'm sure Ron Paul will be able to put it in better terms. However, since I'm not running, I'm not going to.
|
Job destroying euphamisms? Like "Global Market"? Or "Free Trade"? Sounds like something Bush would say. Or "We must stay competative"?
Quote:
|
If I have to choose between having Ron Paul lose, keeping his moral integrity or win, losing that integrity, I would consider the former (losing, keeping integrity) a bargain. Now, obviously, this doesn't mean RP has to be as callous as possible when discussing American workers.
|
Is it moral integrity to give American jobs to the Communist Chinese, where the Chinese government can come in and tax their exports to build a military and American investors then have the gall to come back and say, "You are all obsolete Americans." This is no different then the slave owner selling cotton at a marked up price, and living like a glutton off the massive profits. There is no integrity involved. Its all about cheap foreign labor.
Quote:
|
I think you already have more than enough retards in the demo-republican, authoritarian cesspool. I doubt you will be able to scape anymore off.
|
The US Constitution gives Congress the right to pass tariffs, there is nothing authoritarian about the Constitution.