Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallaroo
Lets make up a little fantasy scenario where you are in a blind alley with nowhere to run, and 3 guys with knives approach you slowly from 20 meters away. Wouldn't you under those circumstances find it more ethical and morally correct to shoot for their legs first?
|
And take the chance that one or two of them is able to keep advancing?
No, it's not more ethical or morally correct.
It's nothing short of absolute fucking stupidity...