Quote:
Originally Posted by Kijana
No, not lazy. Would just like some evidence to back up your claims is all. All I saw was name calling. And trust me, I read a lot about this topic. Part of the job.
Anyways, I will read the papers that Si Modo posted. I have little interest in reading media reports on this issue (which I thought were biased, right? unless you agree with them I guess...), I will stick with the journals. You might want to do the same.
|
Name calling eh ?
I asked you if you were lazy, since you seemed unwilling to know the facts of this issue. You DID say:
...where is the data to support your conclusion? With so many scientists apparently disagreeing with the theory, there should be some solid evidence in the literature, right?
There is PLENTY. That you seem willfully ignorant of it no longer concerns me. I've wasted time arguing with your type before. It's ALWAYS a waste of time because you're not INTERESTED in facts.
Only unsubstantiated propoganda.
Si Modo DID say above:
...contrary to what the press and the propaganda reports, it would be refreshing to bring the level of hyperbole down several notches and actually look at the data and studies.
Which I agree with.