|
Re: The Debate Really IS over... NOT!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Trips
Name calling eh ?
I asked you if you were lazy, since you seemed unwilling to know the facts of this issue. You DID say:
...where is the data to support your conclusion? With so many scientists apparently disagreeing with the theory, there should be some solid evidence in the literature, right?
There is PLENTY. That you seem willfully ignorant of it no longer concerns me. I've wasted time arguing with your type before. It's ALWAYS a waste of time because you're not INTERESTED in facts.
Only unsubstantiated propoganda.
Si Modo DID say above:
...contrary to what the press and the propaganda reports, it would be refreshing to bring the level of hyperbole down several notches and actually look at the data and studies.
Which I agree with.
|
No, I asked for evidence and you gave me mostly op-ed pieces. That might be evidence in your world, not mine.
If you want to preach to your particular brand of the choir, go ahead, but leave me out of it. If you want to discuss the issue without the arrogant tone, I'll be here. The choice is yours.
__________________
He who learns but does not think is lost! He who thinks but does not learn is in great danger. --Confucius
Thus it is that in war the victorious strategist only seeks battle after the victory has been won, whereas he who is destined to defeat first fights and afterwards looks for victory.
--Sun Tzu
Smooth seas do not make skillful sailors.
--African proverb
|