Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff
What I don't understand is WHY MSM, the Clintons and bloggers are not taking note that VIA THE HAND COUNT, Senator Obama actually won NH. The discrepency is amazing. When MSM tries to examine what went wrong, they should also take note that the actual hand count of ALL votes, show Sen. Obama clearly won NH, yet they play into fawning over "the comeback kid" mantra and dismiss the accomplishment of Senator Obama yet Sen. Obama came out of NH with the very same number of delegates as Clinton and is ahead in the delegate count.
But the deep entrenchment of the Clinton's with the party Elite of NH will not allow the State of New Hampshire to re-examine the results and go by the hand count which is more accurate than these machines that were responsible for uncounted votes in the previous Presidential election. This issue needs to be addressed.
I wish there had been a way of crosschecking the election results so that people can be saved from feeling very badly about one of the most sacred democratic processes in America.
|
I'm not sure I'd go that far. The actual vote tally is not under protest from what I understand. This thread is not about a recount, it's about a loophole that bascially allows people to vote in multiple states if they want to or if they are motivated to do so as part of a campaign.
I just see this loophole as something that any campaign could take advantage of. But even though it is allowed because of each state's voting rules, if there was evidence that a candidate were abusing the loophole by identifying individuals who voted in more than one primary, America would likely reject that candidate and they would be ruined.