This sheepish drift into spurious analogy doesn't get you off the hook, pramjockey. I wouldn't normally bother harping on it but you're particularly offensive. Once more, you have absolutely no right to state that the report is 'false'. Believing that there might be an, investigable, alternative explanation is wholly different from brazenly declaring that I have posted a 'false' report. It's disreputable.

Not so long ago I was accused of altering the Google cache to fit my thread title. I think you might have been prominent in that routed throng too.