Quote:
Originally Posted by Oreo
People are in prision for doing something WRONG. It was the Clinton administration that did the 3 strikes & your out. Which I thought was a very good idea. This includes many whites whom are also in prision.
It appears to me that the majority of the white population was more than willing to support a black candidate. Obama didn't get where he is today, simply by blacks voting for him.
Obama makes more than the overwhelming majority of whites in this country.
Yet, Obama made a very poor judgement call. That is to become a member of a racist church, that also blames America for all of their problems. This will spell his doom.
No speech, or continual rejections of his pastor's hateful statements are going to override his 20 year membership into this organization. No one is going to believe his statements: That he didn't know.
If he is the democrat nominee, he is going lose.
One cannot move forward while continually looking out the rear view mirror.
|
There are plenty of people who are not in prison for doing something wrong. Even if we could blame it on forms of ineffective social justice due to simple error, which segment of the population is bearing the brunt of that form of social injustice?
In a mixed market economy, an income (money) can be considered a requirement for any individual. How is any given segment of individuals supposed to be market friendly, when they they can be "arbitrarily" blacklisted from providing labor input to the economy resulting from a form of social injustice?
I am still of the opinion, that the candidates would actually be rendering proper service to our Union, if they provide actual solutions to our current socioeconomic problems.