No, This thread instead seems very silly.

The complaint about the bush administration was that the info that there were repeated unauthorized accesses
did not propagate up to a level where some action should have been taken to prevent the accesses from happening.
This complaint is still as valid as ever.

There were 3 accesses and in here we are talking only 1 of them.
Even this 1 case seems like a long shot.
An anonymous source claims that the CEO has personally adviced Obama?
That is miles away from knowing that the whole company has been staffed by 100% Obama supporters and that they are conspiring to create stunts like this.
It is quite likely that the company employees are about 33% GOP supporters, 33% Democratic supporters and 33% independents.

If that would not be true, but instead the employees would all be Obama supporters, that actually would be very good proof for Obama.
There seems to be huge number of extremely qualified military and counterterrorism people working in that company and
if Obama carries that much support in those circles, then all claims that Obama would not be qualified as a president to fight terrorism would be proven total nonsense.

I know by reading the papers that the CEO of my company where I work is an active supporter on one political party around here,
and it has absolutely no significance to people I work with.

I am sure that whoever that is that does anything illegal like this,
has somebody around him that could be connected to Obama and somebody that
could be connected to Clinton and somebody that could be connected to Bush himself.
I would not be at all surprised if the person that accessed the files had an cousin that was once married to a personal friend of Karl Rove.
Also his highschool best friends sister could be a diehard Hillary supporter.
Of course I just made those up, but I would be very surprised if something like those were NOT true.

You seem not able to recognize a very, very flimsy evidence even when it smacks you in the face.