Originally Posted by partofme

I have mixed feelings about this. I do think that in this case something should also be done to help those that actually lost their houses. I don't think it is a good idea to do either because it encourages risky behavior. Then again a really bad liquidity crisis would eventually filter down and be trouble for everybody. It's a case in which on principle I'm against this action but I know that things could be really bad if it isn't done. No good answer.