Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve
My response was to this statement:
...as opposed to shooting someone in the leg once, which suggests you do NOT consider them as threatening.
And I stand by my statement that you don't know the first thing employing deadly force.
|
Why do you say that?
Quote:
|
Is it theoretically possible to shoot someone in the leg? Of course.
|
Then we are in agreement. So, either both of us don't know anything about deadly force, or not.
Quote:
Is it theoretically possibe to aim for the leg when employing deadly force?
No, it's not. Anyone with any degree of training in this area knows that.
|
And I didn't say it was. I did not even mention deadly force. I simply said it was possible to shoot someone in the leg.
Quote:
|
But you don't know that. Why don't you know that? Because you know nothing about deadly force.
|
Again, how did you reach that conclusion?
Quote:
Here's one that should fuck you all up: Deadly force is not empoyed with the intent of killing someone.
I'm just dyin' to hear your argument against that one...
|
I did not mention "deadly force" in post #45.