|
Re: Screw You, Burma
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speakeasy
So, with America's recent history of going into countries uninvited and destroying the crap out of everything, why don't we apply the same tactic when it comes to supplying aid to Burma? Obviously, we can all agree that the Burmese government are a bunch of retards, so what's stopping us from just flying in and dropping relief supplies on villages? I can't imagine there being a huge international outcry over such an action and what the heck is the Burmese government going to do about it?
Just seems to me that if we applied the same "We're America, so fuck you" attitude we do towards toppling governments we don't like onto helping needful Burmese civilians, they may be a bit better off.
So, what gives? I don't agree with entering countries uninvited, but that seems to be the order of the day recently, so why not run with it?
|
I know that Nick Clegg (Lib Dem leader) in the Uk has been calling for us to do just that. Apparently the Burmise are afraid of scrutany on todays constitutional elections. They've also been taking aid supplies and putting there names on it too pass them off as provided by the gov.
__________________
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. - Voltaire
There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare. - Art of War, Sun-Tzu, Chapter 2, Paragraph 6
"An eye for an eye makes everyone blind"-Gandi
|