Quote:
As the candidate for the future commander and chief, Barack Obama better get his policies and his history in order. The latest gaffe from the Obama camp – besides one of his advisers meeting with Hamas – is Obama's stance on meeting with Iranian officials.
You may remember during a CNN/YouTube debate, Obama said that he would meet with Iran ... "and the reason is this, that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them — which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration — is ridiculous." But now Obama is backtracking on this statement, blaming John McCain for distorting Obama's stance. Too bad for the Obamamaniacs that millions of people saw the debate and know exactly what Obama had to say.
In fact, in Obama's victory speech in North Carolina, he said, "I trust the American people to understand that it is not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but to our enemies, like Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did." Only, Obama's speech writer must have forgotten to do a little bit of homework – FDR and Truman didn't talk directly to their enemies. Harry Truman, as you might remember, ended things with an atomic bomb. There's more to it, but the heart of the story is that Obama doesn't know what is appropriate for a commander and chief, and it seems he hasn't been taking notes for the presidents of the past.
|
boortz.com: Nealz Nuze Today's Nuze
Does this dude have a clue?
Didn't Obama just say last week he wouldn't talk to Hamas because they were a terrorist group? Yet Iran isn't a terrorist country?
As for his history, sounds like he is just a clueless as most libs who re-write history at will.
I believe Harry Turman talked to Japan on the deck of the USS Missouri when they signed a full surrender of war defeated.