Quote:
Originally Posted by tamperpr00f
It's sad really.
Save a tree, don't kill animals, the death penalty is wrong, but don't dare take away a woman's ability to legally kill an unborn child. Anyone who thinks this way is a JACKASS
|
JACKASS isn't an argument. Besides, you - despite what you claim - don't really see it as an "unborn child", with equal rights. Imagine the following scenario (yes, I know it'll never happen, but play along): There is a fire in a fertility clinic. You can EITHER rescue a child OR you can rescue a box of one hundred human embryos. Which do you choose? Unless you're a psychopath, and I don't think you are, you choose the one child over the one hundred of what you claim to consider human.