Quote:
Originally Posted by tamperpr00f
So by your argument a woman should be able to kill her five year old son instead of giving him up for adoption? One person's rights only extend so far as another's. A person's right to choose what happens to their body is trumped by a child's right to live. You don't have the right to execute someone simply because they inconvenience you.
|
Where exactly am I advocating murdering the already born? (I'm curious as to why you specifically used the term "son", but that's another issue.)
Your use of the word "inconvenience" is insulting. Raising a child is unbelievably hard work; it is not simply an inconvenience. It should not be foisted on those who do not want it. Too many lives have been ruined by unwanted pregnancies and children. The lives of the people who already exist must come first.