Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey
 Clearly you don't.
I am hardly a typical anything.
I do dismiss allegations that have no imperical evidence behind them, but I am always willing to look at new evidence and re-evaluate my conclusions.
No, I dismiss many conspiracies because those who purport them are loonies who refuse to answer even the most basic questions and cannot provide any real evidence upon which to base those conspiracies. I also tend towards Occam's Razor as a law upon which much of the universe is based.
Irrelevant.
I didn't guess, because it's irrelevant.
Because they're irrelevant?
No, teachers are trained to examine reality based on facts, not tinfoilhat innuendo.
So nice that anyone who disagrees with your theories is a "drone."
Yep. That's what I posted. I posted this because YOU posted a lot of nonsense. You seem to believe that if you overwhelm your opposition with volume, you have created a convincing argument.
Clearly it doesn't, 'cause you've gotten nothing right so far.
So completely clueless. It's amusing, despite the implied insults.
Maybe better a "drone" than a sucker?
|
Again you prove my point.
In the time it took you to respond to my post, you could have read my ORIGINAL POST.
But, being a typical American, you would rather attack me and my information, then to bother to actually READ THE INFORMATION.
So flipping typical.
You got your "tin fol hat" reference in there, regarding a post you ADMITTED TO NOT EVEN BOTHERING TO READ.
You also called the information "NONSENSE", even though you ADMITTED YOU DIDN'T BOTHER TO READ ANY OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED.
Your post proved everything I said about you is correct. You are a typical, closed minded drone.
THANK YOU.