Quote:
|
You say Obama is not fit to be president, honestly do you think McCain is? or even Bush?
|
Of the three, my first choice would be to have another choice. Beyond that, I'd go Bush.
Quote:
|
Obama probably could not run a lemonade stand becasue he is too busy trying to save America from falling by the waist side, too busy trying to fix what Bush messed up, too busy trying to help instead of hurt, too busy working his butt off to get through to a very racist people, trying his hardest to get people to look past skin color and look at morals, change, issues and (much needed) results.
|
It's good that you've memorized the basic feel-good Obama party line, but you obviously don't know who you're talking about. He is a Chicago Democrat. In Chicago, you don't rise to any office above PTO member unless you 'play the game'. He may not be up to Hillary's level of villany, but he's still at his core a politician, in it for himself first, his various cronies second, and America third. He's undeniably the best looking candidate we've had in a while, and probably one of the better and more emotionally appealling speakers, but it's all a show to get you to hand him the keys to the America car so he can go out carousing and leave the tank empty, or worse still, have it stripped for parts and leave it for you up on blocks. He's busy working his butt off to get you to believe the fairy tale that you've apparently swallowed hook, line, and sinker.
Quote:
|
He is too busy fighting for a change, a necessary change, a much needed change, an important change.
|
Yes, a change from an America being fed lies from a white 'good-ole-boy' persona to an America being fed lies from a black 'brotha-from-the-hood' persona. Don't know about 'much needed' or 'necessary', but certainly a change, and arguably an important one.
Quote:
|
So I ask you sir, when you think of the candidates for President and you look at their background, history, personallity traits, language, speech targets, etc., who then do you see more fit.
|
The best one I know of so far is Bob Barr, tho with so many people voting based on packaging and/or team spirit rather than actual analysis of the issues, he doesn't stand a chance.
Quote:
|
If your answer is still not Obama then perhaps you are onr of thoes many racists who don't want to see a black-man in office.
|
Or perhaps I'm not a sheep, and instead look at the qualifications of the candidates and their positions. I'd have no problem with an openly homosexual black (fill in the blank with a couple other comparable attributes) if I thought they'd actually work for the American people instead of just for their political handlers and supporters.
Quote:
|
I am not calling you a racist persay but I just want you to really think about your statements!
|
And I wish you'd take some time to think about yours. It's too late in the cycle now, but I've said on more than one occassion that if you like what Barak says, you'd love what Ron Paul would actually do. If you're Really about much-needed change, try looking at substance rather than packaging.
(And that doesn't mean McCain - He's probably more of a self-serving change artist than Obama is. Look at the Libertarians, or if you don't value a decent standard of living, the Greens, or perhaps some other party I'm not familiar with that isn't mostly led by corrupt liars.)