Quote:
Originally Posted by Si modo
No Norrin. That's not what he is telling you. You have three posters here who see the potential of your posts and want to clearly hear what you have to say. You could easily be dismissed, but three posters see something in your posts, but not enough.
You've been given suggestions on how to improve the transmission of your message. You keep throwing out the suggestions with veiled insults to posters who are trying to help you. Consider that.
Consider the suggestions of some patient posters.
|
I know my posts are very often too long.
I know people have limited free time and don't want to spend too much time reading a single post.
HOWEVER........
It is very difficult to decide what to exclude from a post.
Take the tax free foundations, for an example.
Rene Wormser wrote a book on the subject, it is 412 pages long.
There are dozens of important excerpts from that book.
Then there is also the information from Norman Dodd's testimony and his interview with Griffin.
To do a really good post on the Foundations and their influence on government would take many links.
How about Bovine Growth Hormone?
You have the people at the FDA who lost their job trying to do the right thing. You have two news reporters who were fired for trying to do the right thing. You have 5 doctors from Canada who claim they were pressured into approving rBGH and were even offered bribes, then they were hit with a gag order and several of these doctors were punished.
This is just 3 parts to the puzzle. There are many more. Which parts do I include and which parts do I exclude?
All the pieces are very important.
When looking at a puzzle, you need at least MOST of the pieces, if you want to see what the picture is. You simply can't see shit with only one or two puzzle pieces.
Anyways, thanks for the advice, I will try to be more concise in the future and I will try to make my posts shorter.