|
Re: What is your view on appropirate Judicial Philosphy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124
What is the original intent of the framers (as you assert it should be interpreted to mean) and who established it?
The fact that you would ask such a simplistic question demonstrates you have no clue what you are talking about. One determines it through exacting scholarship and research (some more complicated than others).
See the above.
No how about you start demonstrating some actual intelligence and start ANSWERING the same questions about your position that you keep asking of others. Put up or admit you are completely clueless and ignorant of this topic.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124
I see no reason to answer any more of your inane questions until you show some basic class and courtesy and start answering the questions YOU have been asked.
I do not need to defend my knowledge to you, espcecially when you have shown wholesale ignorance in this matter. You have nothing to contribute thusfar to the conversation other than willfully ignorant questions challenging what is basic knowledge to anyone who's ever had a modicum of learning in this area; while at the same time making utterly unsubstantiated assertions and rather hypocritically refusing to answer the very types of questions and challenges to your own positions that characterize your own response to other people's. Time to put up or shut up. Good day to you.
|
Since you don't know when the Plain Meaning Cannon was actually established, we shouldn't assume it was actually part of the well established aw of legal instrument interpretation at the time the Constitution was made? Don't you agree?
__________________
I find it appalling that Justice Antonin Scala, in his dissenting opinion in McCreary County v. ACLU, constructed his model of "the relationship between church and state" in America without even considering the actual text of the Constitution. How do incompetents like him get on the U. S. Supreme Court?
|