You don't think Obama would have Clinton as VP, even only for historical purposes?

In the past, it seemed that rotating our two parties into and out of office may have been a good thing since the democrats were more socialist, but willing to use some of that socialism to improve infrastructure; and the republicans were were more open market oriented and willing to try to keep taxes lower. It was more of a pendulum or equilibrium moving in and out of optimum.

Now that the republicans have abandoned their limited government and market friendly platform, I think they should take this election cycle off to reformulate their supply side economics theories to supply us with better government at lower cost.

Hopefully, the democratic party inertia will continue and we may get infrastructure development and upgrade as was the case with some of Bill Clintons' policies.