Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdzeye
Perhaps the resident righties could take a short break from bashing the thread parent, just long enough to provide a few examples of Cheney's deep commitment to preserving the environment.
That would be an excellent way to prove that the premise of this thread is bogus, if that's what you're trying to do.
|
I can't speak for "righties" but I can say that your suggestion wouldn't prove that the premise is bogus. Even supposing Cheney
did have some commitment to the environment, that wouldn't really apply as evidence that his Office
didn't seek to manipulate Congressional testimony related to greenhouse gases and public health. And, since those examples you seek are most likely nonexistant, I want to note that their nonexistance doesn't act as evidence that Cheney's Office
did manipulate or censor testimony.
I can't tell exactly what the premise of the thread is, but going by the title, it seems to be that "Cheney censored global-warming facts," which is bogus because the thread provided nothing to back up such an assertion.