|
Re: SCOTUS Denies Widow
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake
The SCOTUS, like any court, can overturn laws which are against the public interest because they work at cross purposes to other laws, are manifestly unjust, "toothless" etc. Besides, didn't they just refuse to even hear the case?
The Bush appointees are telling the corps loud and clear, we, the people, can elect who we please, they will keep the plutocracy in charge anyway. Bushco will still be screwing us 20 years from now.
Yeah, who's President doesn't really matter.
|
so lets get straight to the point Drake, the SC of Rehnquist was Con. see; decision of 93 and the SC is a “con” court now? I see.... 
__________________
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.
So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.
Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.
The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)
|