View Single Post
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
Chocobot's Avatar
Chocobot Chocobot is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,049

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattLarson View Post
Sure, you can say whatever you want about Allah, Buddah, Jesus, Mohammed, Vishnu or the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Of course one can mention anything at any time. For example;
ihvhivkiviug8ob8g8

However, the question remains over your motive for mentioning Allah. You could have said God, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, the Buddha, Vishnu, Jehovah or anything. But you said Allah.

Despite the fact that the discussion is not even about religion!

I contend you said Allah because of WS. You wouldnt have said Allah if you were talking to anyone else. You in fact sought to hold up Allah to WS's face in the hope of pointing out a contrast between Allah's message and WS evil words (in your view). You also thereby implied that WS would be keen to adhere to Allah's message and thus he would be guilty of hypocrisy. All this done in ignorance of Allah, or WSs thoughts on Islam.

Whats then curious of course. Is that given that you think all this is ok, would you then disagree with others doing the same thing?

For example, in an argument with a Jew - "Oooo your Jehovah will be so disappointed" or a christian "your God would be so disappointed" to a Christian in a discussion about the economy is a reprehensible act. But surely you would then thus agree that its ok??


Quote:
Right, because an arbitrary declaration that a 15 year old boy is not innocent makes it acceptable to call his cowardly murder "VERY HEROIC".

If WS didn't arbitrarily decide that the 15 year old child wasn't innocent, then he'd have to face up to the fact that he actively supports killing children.

Matt
No more arbitrary than other comment though is it? Isnt your assertion that the murderer is a coward also arbitrary? After all, this murderer put his own life down also, and knowingly.

The 'arbitrary' comment is baseless.

The only question remaining is the innocence of the 15 year old. Obviously he (WS) does support the killing of guilty children engaged in the act of land theft. But then dont you to support the killing of guilty chidren? Wouldnt you defend yourself with lethal force against an armed child?
Reply With Quote