View Single Post
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2008
Speedyer's Avatar
Speedyer Speedyer is offline
City Mayor

 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 2,002

United_States     Florida

Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by htperr6565 View Post
no bombs and no invasion were necessary. the japanese had no navy by that point, therefore no means to project their will on anyone but themselves.
Yet they didn't surrender after we destroyed their navy, they didn't surrender after Germany fell, and they didn't surrender after we took their outer Islands and threatened invasion. Instead they fought to the last man with whatever they had, ontinued Kamikaze attacks and prepared school children for invasion. Sounds like a very reasonable enemy to me. Yet you say there was no reason for an invasion, even though Japan had made no meaningful strides towards surrendering even after it was clear to anyone that they had lost the war.

I guess we should of stopped beating up on poor ol' Japan by that point, and hoped they learned their lesson. Hell, even after the second bomb destroyed Nagasaki, the Japanese militarist faction refused to surrender and Emperor Showa had to break up the deadlock.

So I don't see where you get the idea that there wouldn't have been an invasion, and a deadly one at that if we hadn't dropped the atomic bomb.

Last edited by Speedyer; 09-01-2008 at 11:39 AM.
Reply With Quote