View Single Post
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2008
htperr6565's Avatar
htperr6565 htperr6565 is offline
Secretary of Defense
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 3,457

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedyer View Post
Yet they didn't surrender after we destroyed their navy, they didn't surrender after Germany fell, and they didn't surrender after we took their outer Islands and threatened invasion. Instead they fought to the last man with whatever they had, ontinued Kamikaze attacks and prepared school children for invasion. .
What you fail to realize, is that a surrender was not needed, if you are not an egoist in washington.

The whole spat with Japan was about them expanding, not existing. They had not ability to expand on the eve of the drop. Who cares if they surrender? They were stuck on their island surrounded by the biggest navy in the world. a one year blockade could have produced a surrender without vaporizing half a million. why let the military government decide the fate of thousands? i thought america was above stuff like that, not just another calculating country.
no fight was needed. the fight in all practical sense was over. the japanese war machine was crushed.

why was a surrender so important? the war was not all or nothing at the beginning (japan just wanted to slap our navy out of the way while they picked up a resource empire, similar to ours). why did it become so at the end?
__________________
Reply With Quote