Quote:
Originally Posted by CYDdharta
Hell, I'd even be happy with wiki links that support your position; at least I might get some idea as to just what your position really is. So far, you’ve offered NOTHING, other than completely baseless assumptions. The problem isn’t time, I’ve already wasted a lot of time digging up wiki links and links about the status of the Japanese Navy; the problem is your “strategy” is far too vague to comment on in any more detail.
|
My position is extremely simple, but you cannot understand it because no one ever taught you that you are allowed to think outside the box on certain issues, and not just through the same old simplisitic perspectives that dominate historical discussion.
The article provided by Si Modo argues that Japan was NEVER a formidable enemy, and offers plenty of evidence as to how lop sided the war was FROM THE BEGINNING. Considering that Japan is far weaker in 1945 than 1941, the burden of proof now rests with YOU to demonstrate that Japan was capable of offensive warfare in 1945, when its home island is cut off from its industrial resources in the pacific rim and has a navy that is bigger than all the world's navies combined sitting politely outside its shores.
let me guess, these are 'boundless assumptions'?
when then lets hear your conclusive evidence, professor. LOL