|
Re: Death penalty reasoning
In my view, the "three strike rule" is not effective. What it will do is push lifers to commit more crimes against other inmates. Life sentenced individuals have nothing to lose and many I bet would rather be put to death anyway.
As opposed to the death penalty I firmly believe there are more effective ways to punish an inmate. By torture, in certain circumstances, we can truly give criminals a taste of their own medicine and this in turn will deter future crime. For example, If a man or woman is convicted of violentely raping a child he/she should be punished to where the torture fits the crime. By implementing torture, in certain circumstances, we can reduce the length of time that violent felons serve in prison. This will allow citizens taxes to be allocated to better funded rehabilitation programs for less serious offenders.
In conclusion, this provides a quicker, better effective, and cheaper alternative to life sentencing. It also is a better effective way to punish according to the crime they commit while in society.
Last edited by Intergalatic84; 11-22-2008 at 12:51 PM.
Reason: Grammar is bad
|