Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanngrisnir3
Yawn. More baseless claims based on opinion that itself is based on non-quantifiable characteristics. I assure you, insurance actuaries do no have an 'idiot' table that they use in their calculations.
|
So malpractice insurance rates have no relationship to the performance of those practicing as doctors?
(yep, insurance actuaries just make up numbers)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanngrisnir3
What utter pedantic bullshit. Practicing medicine most certainly does not require this, as the vast majority of physicians over human history have shown.
|
Practicing medicine doesn't
legally require it, as I've said over 1000 times
The relevant issue is the
track record of physicians who practice in modern times, a record which can be adequately described by. . .
Statistics on Medical Malpractice Lawsuits «
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanngrisnir3
You're saying that all pilots who aren't doctorates in avionics or physics are not really flying and it's outrageous they call themselves pilots.
|
False analogy--a pilot's job doesn't require any
original on-the-job scientific analysis (as opposed to what's expected of doctors).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanngrisnir3
Take you, for example.
I know all about science. What did you want me to clear up for you?
Show me where all the physicians are who are doing this, and in what numbers.
Again, more semantic bullshit word-games to support your 'point'; no one here buys it.
It's obvious you know nothing about how the field of medicine works, or sciene in general. There are researchers and their are practioners, and their worlds almost never exist at the same time, in the same place, although they complement each other.
|
In a specialty field where insight and original thinking can save lives, being a proficient researcher definitely makes one a better practitioner.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanngrisnir3
I have zero tolerance for people such as yourself who bray on and on endlessly about things they are tragically pig-ignorant of.
|
And maybe if MP rates didn't top $200K/yr., your notion about doctors' training being sufficient would have some credibility.