Quote:
Originally Posted by solletica
So malpractice insurance rates have no relationship to the performance of those practicing as doctors? 
(yep, insurance actuaries just make up numbers) |
No, I never said that. That you would even as such a question shows the desperation behind your statments.
Quote:
Practicing medicine doesn't legally require it, as I've said over 1000 times  The relevant issue is the track record of physicians who practice in modern times, a record which can be adequately described by. . .
Statistics on Medical Malpractice Lawsuits «
|
That link does nothing to support what you've stated.
Quote:
False analogy--a pilot's job doesn't require any original on-the-job scientific analysis (as opposed to what's expected of doctors).
|
Neither is it
expected of doctors, other than by you.
Quote:
In a specialty field where insight and original thinking can save lives, being a proficient researcher definitely makes one a better practitioner.
|
Zero evidence of this other than your uneducated opinion.
Quote:
And maybe if MP rates didn't top $200K/yr., your notion about doctors' training being sufficient would have some credibility.
|
You have no idea what the fuck you're talking about, and haven't answered where the MD with PhDs are and how many of them there are.
As such, and with your unable to actually answer what is asked or support what you've stated, we're done here.