Quote:
Originally Posted by MattLarson
You are the one braying about how the test is bogus, not me.
The burden of proof is on you - I've simply been refuting your uninformed statements.
As far as the tutors, it's a pointless and stupid argument. Was there a regulation forbidding tutors? If not, where's the issue?
Matt
|
Wrong.
Since the city was against the test, the competing test company said it was bad, and the only quote we have from a firefighter was of an example of it being bad, then it is up to you to disprove all of them.
While there is nothing forbidding tutors, the city is well within their authority to consider the fact tutors were used.
The deliberation process for promotions are not automatic.
They can use almost any criteria they feel if important.