Quote:
Maat222
No one would or could normally hire a tutor in order to take a promotions test.
That would totally skew the results.
Only a wealthy person would or could do that.
And anyone hiring a tutor would not be any better qualified for the job then they were before they hired the tutor.
In fact, if they have to hire a turtor, they probably could not actually do the real job, where there are no tutors.
|
I think you need to be medicated. You are making such wildly baseless presumptions that it is clear you are out of your mind.
Only the "wealthy" can afford tutors? What are you basing that stupid statement on?
According to your reasoning, someone who gets 30% on a test having not studied with a tutor is MORE qualified than someone who gets 90% having gotten help studying from a tutor? That is just stupid. If you honestly believe that, then you are clearly incapable of any truly rational discussion.
Everyone knows what really happened here. The people who did well are by and large the people that actually made an effort to prepare for the exam.
You have made intellecutally incoherent arguments in defense of what is just a stupid (whether willfully ignorant or refelective of your lack of intellectual capacity) position.
__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!"
----Denny Crane
