Quote:
Originally Posted by compote_tom
I didn't know you had to be a lawyer to disagree w/a SCOTUS decision. Every school kid could at least cite Dred Scott,, granted it's ancient. But someone who wants to be VPOTUS, who may have to appoint a SCOTUS justice, should be able to discuss a few decision, even if you can't name them you could say what the decision was about, like Miranda, prayer in school.
|
It's looks like you are fairly new to this board--
you may want to go to the media thread & find what is titled "Helen Thomas is even getting mad"-
Watch the video--of an ULTRA liberal journalist--who has been with the White House Press Core since dirt was invented
"out" BO on getting all of his questions from reporters "pre--screened" prior to any interviews.
It would really be fairly easy to "beef up" on your answers if you knew what the questions were going to be in advance.
As far as Sarah Palin--she did not get a choice of the questions or knew prior to the interview what was going to be asked by Katie Courick & Charlie Gibson.
And a special note to Charlie Gibson & Katie Courick--
I thought is was extremely odd --that they did not ask Sarah Palin any questions regarding the economy & or her expertice which is
energy. All the questions were OFF THE WALL questions that were not the #1 concerns of the American people. Those questions were specifically designed by the left wing main stream media to destroy her.
BTW--
If you have ever seen BO off of the teleprompter & get an off the wall question--he studders worse than G.W. Bush ever did.