Quote:
Originally Posted by danielpalos
If at-will employment is the default form of employment in an at-will employment state, why would for-cause stipulations not be a form of liability to anyone who is hired at-will in such a state, ceteris paribus?
Are you claiming that organs of a state do not have to comply with existing US doctrines, which are recognized by the state, and state statutes enumerating at-will employment, with full faith and credit of public acts of such a state?
My question is, how does any organ of any state that recognizes at-will employment doctrine and has existing at-will employment statutes, find any justification or authority to require for-cause stipulations?
|
no dude. they are TWO SEPERATE things. one governing employment that is at will. the other governs how the benefits for unemployment are allocated is specific to no fault unemployment. this implies that there is such a thing, as does the employment statute itself when it mentions good cause, bad cause or no cause. there is such a thing as bad cause or no cause so the statute stands to protect those people.