Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl
You are still not getting it. I'm not posting opinion or religious gobbledygook when it comes to the stated conclusions of the peer reviewed science. I'm merely stating the facts as they are in the state of the science. There has been no legitimate challenge to that.
|
Sure there has, you are just unwilling to accept it.
You will continue claiming that this is the scientific "consensus" no matter
who shows you different.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl
I don't disagree with that in principle. So long as you understand that nature does not 'correct itself' in favor of humans or in favor of anything in particular.
|
Oh, I'm
well aware of that. We're
way "out of balance" here on Earth.
Should we start panicking and scuffling around trying to "save ourselves" when we haven't the foggiest idea what, when or how something "might happen" ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl
Given that the science indicates we are the main (or only) driver of modern climate change, it behooves me to inquire why you would sit back and let nature correct what is still in our power to mitigate?
Andrew
|
First of all, the science does
not indicate that at all. Some scientists say that some scientists don't say that.
Which scientists do you wish to worship ?
Second, I don't think there is anything that we can do that will have any effect at all.
Sure, we could all start living like the Amish people and stop driving cars and burning fossil fuel etc etc. It's silly to think that doing something like this would change
anything about the Earths climate.
Though it
would probably cause a big die off.