Quote:
Originally Posted by danielpalos
How a State promotes and provides for its general welfare is a States' rights issue.
If you only want to quibble, shouldn't it be up to the populace of that State to determine their local form of government as a privilege and immunity arising from the Ninth and Tenth Amendments?
A republic is a republic for the purposes of Statism.
|
NO ITS NOT. Communist dictatorships and democratic forms of government would never get along in some form of binding government.
think of how it would be if we had the king of texas and the king of california (total monarchy with accompyaning fuedal system and laws) while the rest of the us was democratic.
That wouldn't work would it?