|
Re: Parents sue bat company, 12 retards award them $850,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve
It's a fucking baseball bat.
You're alledgedly an educated woman. Are you unable to deduce the potential hazards of something, especially when you see how they're used?
I have absolutely no doubt that the parents knew what the hazards were.
They're just cashing in on the fact that there was no warning on the bat and, in that, they saw a potential pay day.
My question would be this: Had the warning been printed on the bat, can the family demonstrate that the use of the bat, used as it was designed to be used, wouldn't have resulted in the exact same result? I think they should've been forced to demonstrate that...
|
Yes, I AM an educated woman. But at no point in my education was I instructed or tested upon the differences in wooden baseball bats and metal baseball bats. Not would I have any reason to think there would/could be a difference.
As to the family being 'forced' to demonstrate something........there are many things a family with a dead child can demonstrate. Serously doubt you would won't to see any of them though....
__________________
Education is.....man's going forward from cocksure ignorance to thoughtful uncertainty. -Kenneth G. Johnson
Live in the sunshine, swim the sea, drink the wild air… - Ralph Waldo Emerson
|